Australia 1-1 Brazil: lessons for India

When a coach prepares for an opponent, the most valuable footage is not their best match. It is the match where a team of similar or lower standing made them uncomfortable. Two days ago, while India were drawing with Panama in Bengaluru, Brazil were being held by Australia on the other side of the Indian Ocean. That is the match I would want India's staff to have on the screen this week.

I want to be clear about the limits first. I am working from the published match reports, the lineups and what the coaches and players said afterwards, not from full tactical footage. Where the reports agree, I will state it as fact. Where they differ, I will say so, and where I am drawing a conclusion of my own, I will mark it as one. Australia and India are also different teams with different players, so the point is not to copy Australia. It is to see which parts of their approach travel.

What happened in Australia against Brazil?

The facts, from Football Australia's official match report, with details matching ESPN's report and the ABC's live coverage:

Score: Australia 1-1 Brazil, international friendly, Townsville, Friday 25 September. The ABC gave the crowd as 25,440.
First half: Australia started on the front foot. Connor Metcalfe had the first shot after winning the ball high up the pitch, and Irankunda forced a save from Hugo Souza with a dipping strike from distance. The two teams won eight corners between them before half-time.
Disallowed goal: just before the break, Estevao finished after a wall pass with Endrick, but the goal was ruled out on video review because Bruno Guimaraes had fouled Harry Souttar earlier in the move.
68 minutes, Irankunda: a free kick from just outside the box, won when Douglas Luiz fouled Paul Okon-Engstler, curled past Souza into the top corner.
Stoppage time, Rayan: the Bournemouth winger, a 76th-minute substitute, headed a Raphinha set piece in off the underside of the crossbar. The official report and the ABC describe the delivery as a corner. The official report puts it in the fourth minute of stoppage time and ESPN in the fifth; either way, it was one of the last actions of the match.

According to Yahoo Sports' lineups, Australia started in a 3-4-2-1: Patrick Beach in goal; Alessandro Circati, Souttar and Lucas Herrington as the back three; Jacob Italiano and Aziz Behich as the wing-backs; Jackson Irvine and Okon-Engstler in the middle; Metcalfe and Irankunda behind Tete Yengi. Brazil's starting eleven had Matheuzinho, Marquinhos, Vitor Reis and Douglas Santos at the back, Guimaraes and Danilo Santos in midfield, and a front four of Estevao, Raphinha, Endrick and Vinicius Junior.

Two more facts give the result its weight. ESPN notes that Australia have beaten Brazil only once in twelve meetings, and that Carlo Ancelotti kept only nine players from his World Cup squad for this trip. So this was a changed Brazil, but still a side full of players who start for the biggest clubs in Europe.

How did Australia trouble Brazil in the first half?

The ABC's live coverage described the Socceroos running Brazil's midfield ragged in the first half, with both of their wide defenders finding space to push on. The official report adds the key detail: the first shot of the match came from Metcalfe winning the ball high up the pitch.

Look at Brazil's shape and you can see why that worked. Two central midfielders with four attackers in front of them is a structure built to hurt you when it has the ball. Without the ball, it asks a great deal of those two midfielders. If the front four do not press together, or do not get back quickly after losing the ball, the two in the middle are left to cover the whole width of the pitch. This is my inference from the lineup and the reports rather than something the reports state, but it is the obvious place to attack.

Australia's 3-4-2-1 put two players, Metcalfe and Irankunda, in the pockets either side of Brazil's midfield pair. When Australia won the ball in midfield, those two were already in space. When the wing-backs pushed on, Brazil's wide forwards had to choose between tracking them and staying high for the counter. Against a front four who prefer to stay high, that choice usually goes the attacking team's way.

A team that attacks with four is defending with six. The question is whether you can get the ball into the space the other four have left.

I wrote about this idea from the other side in my piece on rest defence: how many players a team keeps behind the ball while it attacks, and what happens when the count is too low. Brazil's rest defence is where Australia found their joy. The same thinking applies to India.

How did Australia defend the second half?

The second half was a different match. Brazil made changes on 65 minutes, bringing on Douglas Luiz and Pedro, and then Rayan on 76. The ABC described Brazil camping on the edge of Australia's box, with all eleven Australian players within about twenty metres of their own goal line at times. The official report credits Herrington with three blocks and four clearances.

It is worth being honest about this. That is not a plan any coach draws up at the start of the week. It is what happens when a better team has the ball for long spells and the players are tiring. What matters is whether the deep block stays organised or starts to leak. Before the goal, Brazil's clearest chance came on 64 minutes, when a deflection fell to Estevao in front of goal and he could not direct it on target. After it, Australia's block held for more than twenty minutes, with defenders throwing themselves in front of shots, until the last few moments.

Brazil's coach and one of their midfielders also pointed to the conditions. Ancelotti said, as the ABC reported: "The pitch was not so good to play good football." Guimaraes said the pitch made it hard to pass the ball properly. I take that seriously, because a slow or bobbly surface does favour the team defending deep. It is also exactly the kind of thing a home side in Kolkata can think about when it plans the week.

Why did the equaliser come from a corner?

This is the part I would spend longest on with a squad, because it is the one that can be coached.

Late in a match, when a team has defended deep for twenty minutes, set pieces become the most dangerous moments for them. Legs are heavy, concentration is thinner, and the attacking side has usually brought on fresh players. Brazil's scorer was a substitute who had been on for less than twenty minutes. The ABC reports that the header went through the goalkeeper's hands and in off the bar. Rayan got to a very good delivery from Raphinha before anyone could stop him.

I cannot tell from the reports whether Australia were marking zonally, man for man, or with a mix. What I can say is what every coach checks after a goal like that:

Who owned the space where the ball landed? In a zonal system, a named player owns each zone, and the zone where the header was won should have been his. In a man-marking system, a named player owns the scorer.
Did the substitutions change the marking plan? When the opponent brings on a new aerial threat late in the match, the defending team has to reassign him at once. If that job is not given to someone clearly at the next stoppage, the new man is free.
What happened to the goalkeeper's starting position? If a keeper is crowded or starts too deep, a good delivery to the near or central area becomes very hard to deal with.

I covered a similar moment from the other side after Brentford beat Chelsea 3-0, where the far post was the space nobody owned. The principle is the same. Against a side with Raphinha delivering, every set piece in the last fifteen minutes is a real chance for them, and every defender needs to know his job before the ball is placed.

What does this mean for India against Brazil?

India play Brazil at the Vivekananda Yuba Bharati Krirangan in Kolkata on 3 October. The AIFF says Brazil are ranked fifth in the world, making them the highest-ranked side India have faced since the FIFA ranking began in 1992. Brazil play Australia again in Brisbane on Tuesday before they travel, so India's staff will have two recent Brazil matches to study rather than one.

I would not ask India to play like Australia. The players are different and the squads prepare in different ways. But three parts of what happened in Townsville do travel, and they fit with what India showed against Panama.

1. Pick your moments to press

Australia's best spell came from winning the ball high early on, when Brazil were not yet settled. India do not need to press for ninety minutes. They need two or three planned triggers: a pass back to a centre-back who is facing his own goal, a slow pass into one of Brazil's two midfielders, a heavy touch. When one happens, three players go together. When it does not, the team drops into its shape. Pressing that is organised around triggers costs much less energy than pressing everything, and it creates the same kind of chance Metcalfe had.

2. Attack the space behind Brazil's front four

Against Panama, India's goal came from a long pass behind the defence after a decoy run, which I broke down in my review of the Panama match. Against Brazil, the space may be in a different place: between the front four and the two midfielders, where Australia's two attacking midfielders found room. India's midfield runners, and whoever plays off the front man, should be told to look for that pocket the moment the ball is won. One forward pass into it, and the Brazilian midfield pair has to turn and run.

3. Treat set pieces as a separate match

This works in both directions. Irankunda's free kick came from a foul just outside the box when Brazil were being pulled around. Brazil's equaliser came from a corner deep in stoppage time. For India, that means two pieces of work this week. First, a clear plan for dead balls around Brazil's box, with the best striker of the ball ready. Second, an owner for every space and every Brazilian attacker at corners, with the list updated every time Brazil make a substitution. I wrote about the same idea for restarts from the other end of the pitch in defending the long goal kick: whoever wins the first contact, the team that has already named its second line usually wins the ball.

What should India watch for in Brazil's match on Tuesday?

Brazil against Australia in Brisbane is useful scouting, and I would give India's analysts four questions to answer from it.

Does Ancelotti keep the same front four? If Estevao, Raphinha, Endrick and Vinicius start again, Brazil are likely to leave the same space behind them. If he adds a third midfielder, the pockets Australia used will close.
How quickly do Brazil counter-press after losing the ball? In Townsville the reports suggest Brazil were slow to react early on. A team this good usually corrects that in the next match.
Who takes Brazil's set pieces, and where do they aim? Raphinha's delivery made the equaliser. Knowing whether he goes for the near post, the penalty spot or the far post is basic preparation.
How do Brazil respond if they concede first? They pushed hard for the last twenty minutes in Townsville. India need to know what that pressure looks like before they face it.

What would a good night in Kolkata look like?

In my preview of this window I argued that the scorelines against Brazil and Uruguay matter less than whether the plan holds. Australia's result does not change that. A draw against Brazil is exceptional for any side, and Australia have only one win against them in twelve meetings. India, ranked much lower, should not measure the evening by the final score.

What Australia's evening does show is that Brazil can be made uncomfortable by a team that knows exactly what it is trying to do: press at chosen moments, get the ball quickly into the spaces a four-man front line leaves, and treat every set piece as its own small match. None of that needs a squad of Premier League players. It needs clear jobs, repeated in training until nobody has to think about them.

After Panama, I said the camp is working. Brazil are the hardest test of that so far. If India can defend deep for long spells without panicking, take one or two chances from pressing or set pieces, and stay organised when the substitutions come, they will have learned more in one evening than in most of the year. That is the job for the next six days.

All match analysis